AR-News: Another suit to be filed against Wyoming wolf management

jim robertson wolfcrest at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 7 13:34:03 EDT 2004


Another suit to be filed against Wyoming wolf management

By ROBERT W. BLACK
Associated Press writer Wednesday, July 07, 2004


CHEYENNE (AP) -- A coalition of more than two dozen Wyoming agricultural, 
sportsmen and predator control groups along with county governments 
announced Tuesday they have served notice of intent to sue over the federal 
gray wolf recovery program.

The Wolf Coalition, as it calls itself, intends to seek judicial and 
monetary relief in federal court for alleged violations of the Endangered 
Species Act because of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's rejection of the 
Wyoming wolf management plan.

The groups also contend the service failed to properly manage wolves in the 
state or follow its own recovery plan.

"Our criticisms of the FWS relate to its efforts to change the rules of the 
game after play has already started," Lincoln County Commissioner Kathleen 
Davison said in a release.

"The Recovery Plan, Final Rule and Environmental Impact Statement all 
defined what the end goals were to be. We have met those goals, yet the FWS 
is now attempting to impose other requirements."

The Fish and Wildlife Service is seeking to dramatically expand the 
geographic region for the wolf beyond the Yellowstone area, Davison said.

When Wyoming's plan was rejected in January, concern was expressed by 
federal officials over a so-called "shoot-on-sight" provision in much of the 
state outside the Yellowstone area to help control a rapidly expanding wolf 
population.

Ed Bangs, Rocky Mountain wolf coordinator for the service, said from his 
office in Helena, Mont., he has no problem with citizens filing suit.

"I don't trust government that much, so I'm glad we have a system where 
people can challenge these decisions," he said.

Bangs said he's somewhat disappointed that the Fish and Wildlife Service 
wasn't able to more clearly express the reasoning and rationale behind its 
wolf management decisions.

"We'll defend our position," he said. "I think we made the right decision 
and I think all the records will clearly show that."

A notice of intent must be filed 60 days before a lawsuit is filed against 
the government over the Endangered Species Act.

The group's notice was delivered June 28 to Secretary of the Interior Gale 
Norton, Fish and Wildlife Service Director Steven Williams and Ralph 
Morgenweck, Denver-based regional director for the service.

The Wolf Coalition claims Fish and Wildlife rejected Wyoming's plan despite 
the fact the gray wolf population has not only met but exceeded recovery 
criteria.

The coalition said the government anticipated a "recovered" population would 
total about 300 wolves. The groups point out that in 2003, the service 
estimated at least 761 wolves, including 51 breeding pairs, in Wyoming, 
Idaho and Montana.

By the end of 2003, there were at least 174 wolves in 14 packs living in 
Yellowstone National Park and 76 to 88 wolves in eight packs living in 
Wyoming outside the park, according to agency estimates.

The notice further points out that all but one member of an independent 
review panel concluded that Wyoming's plan would, collectively with the 
Idaho and Montana plans, maintain recovery goal population numbers.

The groups claim Fish and Wildlife turned down Wyoming's plan not because of 
science but political reasons and potential litigation, contrary to the 
Endangered Species Act, which requires decisions based "solely upon the best 
scientific and commercial data available."

The coalition claims that wolves have severely damaged Wyoming's wildlife, 
including elk, moose, deer, bighorn sheep and antelope; the state's ability 
to manage that wildlife and raise revenue; the outfitting and sportsmen 
industries; agricultural interests because of depredation on cattle, sheep 
and horses; and property rights of coalition members.

In April, the state of Wyoming filed a similar complaint against the federal 
government.

Harriet Hageman, a Cheyenne attorney representing the Wolf Coalition, said 
the groups still have the option of filing to intervene.

"The state's lawsuit is a bit more narrow than ours in terms of the claims 
being made and we wanted to make sure all of the bases were covered," she 
said.


http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2004/07/07/news/wyoming/fa16ebc88c3120f587256ec90083833d.txt


“The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long 
before the world runs out of oil.” - Sheikh Zaki Yamani, former Saudi 
Arabian oil minister




More information about the AR-News mailing list