AR-News: (TX - US) Parish the Thought: Eating tasty animals
Snugglezzz at aol.com
Snugglezzz at aol.com
Tue Jul 6 20:17:06 EDT 2004
Parish the Thought: Eating tasty animals
By Jeff Parish
Texas City Sun
Published July 05, 2004
Some people look at a cute little piggy or liquid-eyed cow and wonder what it’
s thinking or maybe what its name is. I just wonder if it would taste better
with ketchup while the rest of it becomes a nice pair of shoes or a jacket.
There are others who wonder how to free the oppressed, captivated animal
(circuses are a favorite target). Most of these fall under the umbrella of People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, perhaps the biggest bunch of nuts I’ve
ever seen. Bag them up and you could sell them at the circus.
Look at the response to my article on the Killer Burger Challenge at P.J.’s
Lunchbox. PETA sent a letter to the editor taking issue with the feature.
Like much of what the animal rights group does, it started out sanely enough,
discussing possible health problems with eating meat, such as heart disease.
I don’t necessarily agree that simply eating meat is going to make you keel
over (it’s more a matter of overall diet and exercise), but it’s a fairly
rational argument.
Unfortunately, the sanity only lasted for a sentence and a half.
>From there, PETA went on to say that “our habit of eating meat results in the
unnecessary and violent death of 42 million cows each year in the U.S.” The
letter talked about how “cows value their lives and struggle to avoid pain”
and are raised on farms where they’re polled, branded and castrated. True,
anything will seek to avoid pain and danger, but value?
Mr. Webster tells us that to value something is “to think highly of” or “to
prize” it. Cows don’t value much beyond a nice supply of hay or grass. There’
s a world of difference between instinctively avoiding pain and valuing life.
But this is just one example of a long history of nuttiness coming from the
animal rights crowd. Just consider these quotes from PETA co-founder Ingrid
Newkirk:
•“When it comes to having a central nervous system, and the ability to feel
pain, hunger, and thirst, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.”
•“Six million Jews died in concentration camps, but six billion broiler
chickens will die this year in slaughter houses.”
•“Even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it.”
The organization’s tactics aren’t any better. PETA supporters have started
going after children, handing out “McCruelty’s Unhappy Meals” to kids outside
McDonald’s. The meal shows a sinister, often blood-splattered, Ronald McDonald
look-alike. In some poses, he wields a bloody knife or ax. In one, he holds a
blood-drenched box with bones, entrails and other parts sticking out of it.
More recently, kids whose mothers were wearing fur were handed a comic book.
The cover portrayed a psycho mom taking a Bowie knife to a rabbit.
Sometimes I think these people should have taken cartoonist Jim Davis’
advice: “Avoid fruits and nuts. You are what you eat.”
You want to be a vegetarian, vegan or even a Raelian, be my guest. But don’t
dare do something like that to one of my kids or anyone else in my family.
There’s no real value in such shock tactics. In fact, it is more harmful to the
cause than anything else. As critic Paul Goodman said, “The damage done by
those who pass off poison as food is far less than that done by those who
generation after generation convince people that food is poison.”
You’re a herbivore. Great. We’re carnivores. Live with it.
Even if, as our recent PETA letter suggested, there isn’t any “need to
support such misery, especially when restaurants and grocery stores everywhere are
stocking up on meat-free foods including veggie burgers and soy hot dogs.”
Please. My meat is going to stay meat and my vegetables, vegetables. Never
the twain shall meet, at least until I put them on my plate.
That’s not to say I’m all for torturing animals. But to put them on the same
level as humans — not to mention even attempting to parallel the Holocaust
with chicken farms — is ludicrous. I’m certainly not going to stop eating meat.
And if animal testing can help cure some of our most devastating diseases,
then go for it. It should be done with as little suffering as possible, but at
the same time, I’d starve a puppy if it would save the life of my daughter or
wife.
PETA’s problem is a lack of perspective. Animals should be treated as
humanely as possible, but you can’t attribute actual rights to them. At best, you can
outline responsibilities their owners have. In the end they’re just critters.
Human welfare is much more important.
What can I say? I love animals. They’re entertaining and they taste great.
Especially on a Killer Burger.
Jeff Parish is copy editor for the Texas City Sun. He can be reached at (409)
945-3441 ext. 38, or by e-mail at jeff.parish at texascitysun.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermail/ar-news/attachments/20040706/53bcd08a/attachment.html
More information about the AR-News
mailing list