AR-News: Managing Nature
jim robertson
wolfcrest at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 5 13:09:57 EDT 2004
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/07/05/EDG6A7G5H31.DTL
Managing Nature
The cougar problem is more manageable than we think
Charles F. McCullough
Monday, July 5, 2004
The mountain lion attack on a woman hiking in Sequoia National Forest last
week makes it clear that California wildlife policy must change: What we
need, to solve the cougar problem, is predator managers (i.e., hunters or
trappers) to achieve a balance between predator and natural prey -- not
human prey.
Many environmentalists acknowledge that California is losing its mule deer.
The fact is we are losing all deer, mule and blacktail, as well as bighorn
sheep, kit foxes and wild turkeys. The reason for these losses is no
predator management -- not people, as most biologists want you to believe,
encroaching on habitat.
In the 1950s and 1960s, after many years of predator management and trapping
for furs, these species were in abundance. Predator management and fur
trapping gave us the largest deer herd (about 2 million) the state
Department of Fish and Game has ever recorded and no encounters between
humans and lions in 77 years.
There needs to be a complete change in the thinking and attitudes of the
state's fish and game biologists. I spent three years in the late 1980s as a
wildlife adviser for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in the Bakersfield
District (involving 35 counties). I attended several meetings with state of
California Department of Fish and Game personnel, as well as biologists,
sportsmen and ranchers. The most vocally angry of the standing-room only
meetings were in Mariposa, Los Banos and Fresno, where participants pleaded
with the Department of Fish and Game officials to do something to control
the predators, especially the mountain lion.
Their calls fell on deaf ears. Biologists said they believed the deer
decline was due to a disease called "blue tongue." San Benito County
sportsmen -- not state biologists -- collected 10 blood samples from San
Benito County deer herds and proved "blue tongue" was not the reason for
their decline, measured at more than 90 percent of the population within the
county. As far as hunters and ranchers were concerned, predators were still
the leading suspects.
California Fish and Game biologists still balk at naming the mountain lion
as the biggest factor in the deer herd decline, despite their own ongoing
study, started in 1993, called the "Round Valley study," and the 18-year
northern Kings County deer herd study headed by biologist Don Neal. Both
studies show the mountain lion as the major factor in the decline of the
deer herd.
Yet, Californians -- prompted by the Mountain Lion Foundation and
environmentalists who saw a financial windfall -- voted in 1990 in favor of
Proposition 117. The so-called mountain-lion initiative earmarked $900
million ($30 million annually for 30 years) to purchase and protect
wildlands critical to cougar survival. The result: an increase in the
mountain lion population from 2,000 in the 1970s to an estimated 4,000 to
6,000 today, according to the California Department of Fish and Game. Bob
Turner, a warden for 30 years with the department, has said it is unclear
what the lion population numbers might be, but it is clear that California
is saturated.
Another irony: Millions in federal tax dollars are now committed to
maintaining the bighorn sheep population in the Sierra Nevada. Most of the
money will be used to reduce and manage the mountain lion population. In
effect, we are now taxed by the state to save the mountain lion and taxed by
the federal government to kill it.
The mountain lion is a beautiful animal. But I believe the lion population
should be controlled by science, not public emotion. What we need are
biologists with common sense, who will understand the importance of
achieving a balance between predator and prey.
Charles F. McCullough spent 25 years as a member of the San Benito County
Fish and Game Commission.
Page B - 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long
before the world runs out of oil. - Sheikh Zaki Yamani, former Saudi
Arabian oil minister
More information about the AR-News
mailing list